The now iconic image of an elated Elon Musk wielding a chainsaw may be unsettling – even to dyed-in-the-wool Republicans – but it does effectively capture the daunting challenges facing the Trump administration’s newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 

DOGE’s seemingly draconian steps to lay off federal workers in large numbers are the inevitable result of federal workers’ union collective-bargaining agreements and civil-service protections that have made it almost impossible to fire any individual federal employee based on job performance. 

These agreements and protections have made a federal job a lifetime position immune from performance assessments and other measures of employee accountability present in the private sector. Unless Congress steps in to reform federal public-employee union agreements and the civil service system, President Donald Trump’s only choice to downsize the government is to proceed with large-scale reductions in force. 

Trump and Musk

President Trump and billionaire Elon Musk have teamed up to identify wasteful federal spending via the Department of Government Efficiency.  (Brandon Bell / Getty Images)

Both men understand that deep cuts in the federal payroll are the only feasible way to win back control of the government so it can serve the president’s agenda that he ran on in 2024. Trusting that new agency heads can fix the workforce of one of the alphabet soup agencies is wishful thinking. 

THE FULL TRUTH ABOUT THE GREAT THINGS DOGE CAN AND CANNOT DO

When I was a director at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 2010-2015, I saw firsthand how employees are nearly completely immune from performance evaluation or firing. And at that time, SEC employees could be evaluated on a performance scale of 1 to 5. 

The current publicly available 2023 union collective-bargaining agreement for the SEC states that employees will be evaluated on performance as “acceptable” or “unacceptable,” essentially pass/fail—and in many schools these days, everyone passes. During my tenure USA Today – not exactly conservative friendly – reported that federal workers are more likely to die on the job than be fired.

Moreover, when I was with the SEC, in one of the rare instances when managers succeeded in firing an employee, the little-known Office of Special Counsel ordered reinstatement. 

President Trump has highlighted the importance of this obscure office by firing the Biden appointee that heads it. The president’s action is a necessary step to re-establish control over the federal bureaucracy. The D.C. Circuit Court lifted an injunction against the firing Thursday and the office head resigned. Leaving a Biden-era official in that job would have frustrated the administration’s attempt to shrink the bloated bureaucracy. 

LET DOGE SINK ITS TEETH INTO OUR BLOATED TECH INFRASTRUCTURE

The Trump administration’s decision to fire all federal employees in their probationary period is also a direct result of the iron-clad job protection created by collective bargaining agreements and civil-service protections like the Office of Special Counsel. Federal employees in their first year generally do not enjoy the union and civil-service protections granted after one year on the job. 

Who pays the price for federal working conditions free of accountability? U.S. taxpayers. 

When I joined the SEC staff in 2010 and tried to reform the examination program that had missed Bernie Madoff’s fraud and massive Ponzi scheme despite numerous examinations, I received a plain manila envelope in my inbox with a copy of false accusations against my predecessor that had been shared with Congress and the press as a warning of what could happen to me if I pushed for change in the exam program. 

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

What I soon learned was that although many federal workers join the government out of patriotism and a desire to serve, the unnatural working conditions steadily grind such employees down and they start to go along with the system where longer-tenured workers often discourage extra effort. 

Indeed, lifetime employment for employees in the federal government is contrary to the U.S. Constitution and is not available to workers in the private sector. In fact, the only lifetime position created by the Constitution is federal judges.

In addition, the Constitution prohibits the creation of titles of nobility that created a lifetime aristocracy in the United Kingdom. No one in the private sector who is working and paying taxes has a lifetime position. Federal workers should be in the same situation as the taxpayers they serve.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

As President Barack Obama was fond of saying, “Elections have consequences.” The November 2024 election showed that Americans are tired of unaccountable federal employees who fail to address their fundamental concerns, including inflation and massive spending on wasteful programs at home and abroad.

With a federal budget that comprises almost 25% of the nation’s GDP, Congress needs to reform the rules governing federal employees to help rein in profligate government spending and waste. All Americans would be more comfortable with a federal workforce that plays by the same employment rules as the rest of working Americans. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM NORM CHAMP



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews



President Donald Trump’s coming wave of tariffs is poised to be more targeted than the barrage he has occasionally threatened, aides and allies say, a potential relief for markets gripped by anxiety about an all-out tariff war. 

Trump is preparing a “Liberation Day” tariff announcement on April 2, unveiling so-called reciprocal tariffs he sees as retribution for tariffs and other barriers from other countries, including longtime US allies. While the announcement would remain a very significant expansion of US tariffs, it’s shaping up as more focused than the sprawling, fully global effort Trump has otherwise mused about, officials familiar with the matter say. 

Trump will announce widespread reciprocal tariffs on nations or blocs but is set to exclude some, and — as of now — the administration is not planning separate, sectoral-specific tariffs to be unveiled at the same event, as Trump had once teased, officials said.

Still, Trump is looking for immediate impact with his tariffs, planning announced rates that would take effect right away, one of the officials said. And the measures are likely to further strain ties with allied nations and provoke at least some retaliation, threatening a spiraling escalation. Only countries that don’t have tariffs on the US, and with whom the US has a trade surplus, will not be tariffed under the reciprocal plan, an official said.

As with many policy processes under Trump, the situation remains fluid and no decision is final until the president announces it. One aide last week referred repeatedly to internal “negotiations” over how to implement the tariff program — and some of the most regularly hawkish signals come from Trump himself, underscoring his avowed interest in sharply raising import taxes as a revenue stream. 

“April 2nd is going to be liberation day for America. We’ve been ripped off by every country in the world, friend and foe,” Trump said in the Oval Office Friday. It would bring in “tens of billions,” he added, while another aide said recently the tariffs could bring in trillions of dollars over a decade.

But the market reaction to initial tariffs imposed on Canada, Mexico, and China — as well as certain metals — has hung heavy over a West Wing serving a president who has long used major indexes as a measuring stick of his success. 

Trump officials publicly acknowledged in recent days the list of target countries may not be universal, and that other existing tariffs, like on steel, may not necessarily be cumulative, which would substantially lower the tariff hit to those sectors. That includes comments from Trump himself, who has increasingly focused his remarks on the reciprocal measures.

It’s already a retreat from his original plans for a global across-the-board tariff at a flat rate, which later morphed into his “reciprocal” proposal that would incorporate tariffs and non-tariff barriers. It’s not clear which countries Trump will include under his more targeted approach. He has cited the European Union, Mexico, Japan, South Korea, Canada, India and China as trade abusers when discussing the matter, an official said.

While narrower in scope, Trump’s plan is still a much broader push than in his first term and will test the appetite of markets for uncertainty and a raft of import taxes.

“There will be big tariffs that will be going into effect, and the president will be announcing those himself,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday.

Markets Overestimating

Kevin Hassett, Trump’s National Economic Council director, said markets are overestimating the scope. 

“One of the things we see from markets is they’re expecting they’re going to be these really large tariffs on every single country,” he told Fox Business host Larry Kudlow, who held Hassett’s job during Trump’s first term. 

“I think markets need to change their expectations, because it’s not everybody that cheats us on trade, it’s just a few countries and those countries are going to be seeing some tariffs.” 

Read more: Trump’s Trade War and the Economic Impact: Tariff Tracker

Trump has also pledged to pair those with sectoral tariffs on autos, semiconductor chips, pharmaceutical drugs and lumber. The auto tariffs, specifically, he said would come in the same batch. “We’re going to do it on April 2nd, I think,” he said in a February Oval Office event. 

But plans for those remain unclear and, as of now, they aren’t set to be launched at the same “liberation day” event, officials said. 

An auto tariff is still being considered and Trump has not ruled it out at another time, officials said. But excluding the measure from the April 2 announcement would be welcome news to the auto sector, which faced the prospect of as many as three separate tariff streams straining supply chains. 

The “liberation day” event might also include some tariff rollbacks, though that’s uncertain. Trump imposed, then heavily clawed back, tariffs on Canada and Mexico for what the US said was a failure to slow shipments of fentanyl destined for the US. The fate of those remains deeply unclear: a Trump pause on swathes of those tariffs is due to expire, but the tariffs could be lifted entirely and replaced with the reciprocal number, officials said. 

‘Dirty 15’

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last week that steel and aluminum tariffs may not necessarily add on to the country-by-country rates. “I will have a better sense as we get closer to April 2nd. So, they could be stacked,” he told Fox Business last week.

In the same interview, he said it’s roughly 15% of countries that are the worst offenders.

“It’s 15% of the countries, but it’s a huge amount of our trading volume,” he said, referring to it as the “dirty 15” and signaling they are the target. “And they have substantial tariffs, and as important as the tariff or some of these non-tariff barriers, where they have domestic content production, where they do testing on our — whether it’s our food, our products, that bear no resemblance to safety or anything that we do to their products,” he said. 

Trump aides considered, before abandoning, a three-tiered option for global tariffs, where countries were grouped in based on how severe the administration considered their own barriers, people familiar with the plans said. That option was reported earlier by the Wall Street Journal.

Trump sees tariffs as a key tool both to steer new investment to the US and to tap new sources of revenue, which he hopes to offset tax cuts Republicans are considering. 

“Tariffs will make America more competitive. They will incentivize investment into America,” Stephen Miran, Trump’s Council of Economic Advisers chairman, said in an interview, declining to detail the steps. 

The White House has also argued that trillions of dollars in pledged announcements by foreign countries and companies provides evidence Trump’s plans are working. Miran told Fox Business last week that talks are ongoing ahead of April 2nd deadline. 

“I do think that it’s perfectly reasonable to expect that we could raise trillions of dollars from tariffs over a 10-year budget window and like I said before, using those revenues to finance lower rates on American workers, on American businesses,” he said.

Still, economists have questioned whether the tariffs would meaningfully impact the deficit, particularly considering the risk of inflation or an economic slowdown.

Read more: Trump’s Tariff Plan Falls Well Short of Filling His Budget Hole

Companies could also adapt, especially if not all countries are subject to the levies. US customs revenues from China surged after the tariffs were imposed in 2018, according a survey last year by the Peterson Institute for International Economics, but then peaked in 2022 and dropped sharply in 2023.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link