There’s a ‘buyer’s strike’ on U.S. assets as foreign investors can’t stomach huge deficits anymore, analyst warns



  • Tepid demand for a 20-year bond auction sent Treasury yields spiking and the dollar tumbling this past week, amid mounting concerns over the federal government’s ability to continue financing massive deficits as Congress looks to add trillions of dollars more in red ink. For Deutsche Bank’s George Saravelos, they’re signs of a “buyer’s strike” among foreign investors.

Foreign investors are starting to shun U.S. assets as massive fiscal and current-account deficits are becoming too much to tolerate, according to George Saravelos, head of FX research at Deutsche Bank.

In a recent note to investors, he commented on tepid demand for a 20-year bond auction this past week that sparked a selloff in Treasuries, sending yields higher. But that wasn’t the worst thing about it.

“The most troubling part of the market reaction is that the dollar is weakening at the same time,” Saravelos wrote. “To us this is a clear signal of a foreign buyer’s strike on US assets and the associated US fiscal risks we have been warning for some time. At the core of the problem is that foreign investors are simply no longer willing to finance US twin deficits at current level of prices.”

The jitters in the bond market also come as the U.S. House of Representatives passed legislation to extend tax cuts from President Donald Trump’s first term as well as add new ones, like no taxes on tips and overtime.

While lawmakers are also writing in some spending cuts, they are more than offset by reductions in tax revenue as well as increased outlays elsewhere, such as in defense. The net effect would be trillions of more dollars added to the budget deficits over the next decade.

The Senate is expected to seek changes to the House’s bill, but tax cuts are a top priority for Trump and congressional Republicans.

Saravelos said there are only two ways to restore the attractiveness of U.S. assets to foreign investors.

“Either the US has to sharply revise the current reconciliation bill currently sitting in Congress to result in credibly tighter fiscal policy; or, the non-dollar value of US debt has to decline materially until it becomes cheap enough for foreign investors to return,” he wrote.

Another headwind that U.S. assets face is bond market drama in Japan, which is facing a fiscal crisis of confidence and soaring yields too.

The largest overseas holder of U.S. debt has its own mountain of debt just as its economy is beginning to shrink, with Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba saying Japan’s fiscal situation is “worse than Greece’s.” On Monday, yields on Japan’s 40-year bond hit highs not seen in some 20 years.

But for Saravelos, higher yields for Japanese government bonds aren’t a reflection of fiscal concerns over the government in Tokyo. If that was the case, the yen would be selling off. Instead, the yen has rallied against the dollar, indicating less participation in the market for U.S. debt.

“We would argue the JGB sell-off is a bigger problem for the US treasury market: by making Japanese assets an attractive alternative for local investors, it encourages further divestment from the US,” Saravelos explained in a separate note this week.

What Japanese investors do is critical to the bond market as the latest official U.S. data show that Japan’s holdings of U.S. debt ticked higher to $1.13 trillion in March—roughly a quarter of its GDP.

Meanwhile, China has been shedding its stockpile of Treasury bonds, which fell to $765 billion at the end of March from $784 billion in the previous month. That pushed China down the list as the third largest holder of U.S. Treasuries, with the U.K. overtaking it to become No. 2.

“At the core of our views in coming months is that the market is becoming increasingly driven by external asset positions, and this is putting combined downward pressure on US bond markets and the USD,” Saravelos said.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews



After Israel took out at least two of Iran’s top scientists behind the development of nuclear weapons (and promised to kill more), my high school fight song came to mind. At football games after a touchdown we sang, “Hit ’em hard and hit ’em again. Show ’em now that we’re gonna win…”

That is precisely what Israel has done in several strikes against its mortal enemy that has threatened to exterminate the Jewish state, reneged on past agreements to curtail its enrichment of uranium and made statements about its religious motivation for attacks on Israel and support of various terrorist proxies. Why shouldn’t Israel be expected to defend itself against the stated aims of the Islamic fanatics in Tehran? If your neighbor threatened to kill you would you not take steps to keep that from happening?

The diplomatic “rope-a-dope” strategy used by Iran to string out negotiations in order to continue pursuing uranium enrichment with a nuclear weapon – its likely outcome – has worked over several U.S. administrations. It is similar to a strategy Japan used at the start of World War II where Japanese negotiators were at the White House the day Pearl Harbor was attacked. You can’t negotiate with evil, or evil wins.

Cal Thomas commentary

Cal Thomas Commentary

Tribune graphic

Mossad, perhaps the greatest intelligence agency in the world (our CIA might take lessons), managed to penetrate deep into Iran with a drone base and other weapons which took out many, but not all, of Iran’s missile launchers. Some missiles got through and hit parts of Tel Aviv, wounding scores and killing some civilians.

President Trump has declared that if Iran doesn’t return to negotiations, it will suffer far worse attacks. That should not be the goal, because there is no evidence that Iran would behave any differently if previously failed negotiations resume.

The goal should be regime change. The current Iranian regime came to power in 1979, thanks to Jimmy Carter undermining the shah, who kept the fanatics now running and ruining the country at bay. The shah had his problems, but was pro-West. Since then, the Islamic regime has sustained itself with guns, crooked elections, by suppressing protests and jailing or killing those opposed to the ayatollahs. The Middle East – indeed the world – would be better off and a safer place if the regime were to fall. The important question is who would take their place? It can’t be a repeat of 1979 with different faces but the same objectives.

There is political opposition in Iran and we occasionally hear voices that claim support for human rights, free elections and other things appealing to Western ears. There have been street protests, which the Revolutionary Guard quickly extinguished. While additional military attacks could set back Iran’s nuclear weapons program even further, force alone is unlikely to topple the government and replace it with people who will live at peace with Israel.

In a televised address after the bombing began, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urged Iranians to effectively overthrow their government: “Israel’s fight is not against the Iranian people. Our fight is against the murderous Islamic regime that oppresses and impoverishes you. The time has come for the Iranian people to unite around its flag and its historic legacy, by standing up for your freedom from the evil and oppressive regime. This is your opportunity to stand up and let your voices be heard.”

That would be the ideal outcome, but fear keeps many people from acting on their beliefs and goals. Overcoming fear takes courage and a willingness to sacrifice even your own life. Are there enough Iranians prepared to stand against the power and weapons of the ayatollahs?

This Cal Thomas commentary is his opinion. He can be reached at cthomas@wctrib.com.

______________________________________________________

This story was written by one of our partner news agencies. Forum Communications Company uses content from agencies such as Reuters, Kaiser Health News, Tribune News Service and others to provide a wider range of news to our readers. Learn more about the news services FCC uses here.





Source link