Robinhood’s Beta: Why This Stock Falls Harder Than The Market (NASDAQ:HOOD)


This article was written by

Small deep value individual investor, with a modest private investment portfolio, split approx. 50%-50% between shares and call options. I have a B.Sc. in aeronautical engineering and over 6 years of experience as an engineering consultant in the aerospace sector. The latter statement is not relevant in any way whatsoever to my investment style, but I thought to add it for self-indulgent purposes. I have a contrarian investment style, highly risky, and often dealing with illiquid options. How illiquid? Well, you can land a Jumbo on the spread and still have clearance for take-off. From time to time, I buy shares, mostly to not be categorized as a degen by my fellow investor friends, therefore the 50%-50% allocation. My timeframe tends to be between 3-24 months.I like stocks that have experienced a recent sell-off due to non-recurrent events, particularly when insiders are buying shares at the new lower price. This is how I often screen through thousands of stocks, mainly in the US, although I may own shares in banana republics. I use fundamental analysis to check the health of companies that pass through my screening process, their leverage, and then compare their financial ratios with the sector, and industry median and average. I also do professional background checks of each insider who purchased shares after the recent sell-off. I use technical analysis to optimize the entry and exit points of my positions. I mainly use multicolor lines for support and resistance levels on weekly charts. From time to time I draw trend lines, taken for granted, in multicolor patterns. Note: I tried to keep my introduction as real, and authentic as possible. I dislike empty suits, high-level BS, deep-level BS, unnecessary jargon, and self-indulgent, third-person written introductions with an air of superiority.Thanks for reading my introduction!

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews



The Pentagon has initiated an investigation incorporating polygraph tests to hunt down leakers after Elon Musk called for the prosecution of any Defense Department officials spreading “maliciously false information” about his dealings with the military.

In response to accusations surrounding Musk’s recent visit to the Pentagon, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s chief of staff, Joe Kasper, called for an investigation into “unauthorized disclosures” of national security information with those found responsible to “be referred to the appropriate criminal law enforcement entity for criminal prosecution.”

Musk, the world’s richest man with billions of dollars in defense contracts, visited the Pentagon on Friday for a conversation about cost-cutting and innovation. The visit sparked controversy before it began after the New York Times reported that Musk was to get a top secret briefing about the US military’s planning for any potential war with China.

The Times, which cited multiple unidentified US officials familiar with the matter, said Musk was scheduled to view sensitive U.S. military strategies concerning China, potentially exposing critical Pentagon secrets given Musk’s substantial business interests there. Musk’s views on China have also provoked concern. He’s called Taiwan “an integral part of China” and once suggested that the self-ruled island become an administrative zone of the country.

Both President Donald Trump and defense chief Hegseth denied there were ever any plans for Musk to get such a high-level briefing. In the Oval Office on Friday, Trump acknowledged Musk’s potential conflict when he explained why he’d never give him such a briefing.

Further intensifying the scrutiny, Musk took to X, a social media platform he owns, insisting on the prosecution of Pentagon officials leaking misleading information to the media.

Hegseth has been one of the most vocal champions of Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, boasting of hundreds of millions of dollars in spending cuts done in collaboration with DOGE staffers. 

The investigation into leaks “will commence immediately and culminate in a report to the Secretary of Defense,” Kasper wrote in a memo issued late on March 21. “The report will include a complete record of unauthorized disclosures within the Department of Defense and recommendations to improve such efforts.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link