My Unconventional Approach to Parenting (and Education)


As with most things in life, I approach parenting 6 kids with a bit of a different style. I’ve been known to wash my hair with mud, and brush my teeth with charcoal, and I’m just as unconventional in raising my kids. Today I’m sharing what this approach looks like, how it’s evolved over the years, and how it ties into our homeschool journey.

I don’t expect everyone to agree with me, but hopefully by sharing my story you can take what resonates with you. I always try to learn something from everyone I meet and I hope you approach these thoughts with the same open mind! Even if you don’t homeschool, I’ve found this first principles approach to parenting can have some pretty drastic results!

You Are Your Own Infinite Autonomous Being

Yes, that’s quite the mouthful, but I do really believe that about people! And since my children are people too, I treat them the same way. I start here, because this idea lays the foundation for every other parenting decision I make. I see my children as inherently whole, capable, and wise in their own way. They’re naturally born full of curiosity, creativity, and the ability to think critically.

Not so sure?

Well, here’s one example. In 1968, a pair of researchers set out to study the creativity of 1,600 preschool age children. Their goal was to see how many kids met the criteria for a creative genius. Someone who could problem solve, think critically, and think outside the box.

They found a shocking 98% of the young children scored as creative geniuses. When they retested the same children at ages 10 and 15, their creativity scores had steadily plummeted to just 12%. A group of adults in their 30s who were given the same test? They scored at 2% creativity. That old saying “If you don’t use it you lose it” applies to our creativity and decision making processes too!

A Paradigm Shift

The biggest takeaway from the 1968 study was that children are born with these skills. Learning these things changed my thinking about how I wanted to approach parenting my kids. I’m not trying to shape my children into a predefined mold of who I think they should be. Instead, my parenting tries to honor them as a whole person.

Part of this approach involves using intrinsic (not external motivation). Yes, sticker charts and promises of cookies for a reward may get the behavior we want in the moment. However, when children make that internal decision for themselves and can see the value in it, positive habits are more likely to stick. Unlike traditional parenting (and education) this approach prioritizes connection and trust in a different way.

I’ll admit that I was much more structured with my older kids when they were younger! I’ve even got some push back from them on how my parenting has changed with their younger siblings. It’s interesting to see their differing opinions, but then again, they are each their own person.

Parenting as a Guide and Partner

While I do believe my kids are born with innate wisdom about their own bodies, wisdom also develops with age. I know I’ve greatly benefited from others’ shared life experiences and wisdom over the years. In the same way I see my role as a mom to be a mentor and a guide for my children.

This involves respecting my children’s emotions, needs, and experiences, instead of simply relying on my own assumptions. I also don’t try to force them to do things and help them to self-regulate and make their own informed decisions. One way I do this is by modeling positive behaviors

Many people are surprised when I tell them I don’t make my kids eat healthy foods! I make sure our home is stocked with healthy foods and it’s available to them, but it’s up to them to eat it. And if they’re out to eat at a friend’s house, they have to learn to make smart choices for themselves. With a little guidance, kids can learn which foods make their bodies feel good and strong, and which ones don’t.

I would also argue that we really can’t make anyone do anything. Ask any parent of a toddler who doesn’t want to eat his broccoli!

Part of this is helping my kids learn to regulate their own emotions. Some (most) days parenting can be hard. This can bring up a lot of overwhelm and challenging emotions. Instead of putting the responsibility of this on my kids, I try to take responsibility for my own parenting triggers.

Make it Irresistible

Another lesson I’ve learned the hard way, is that what we make off limits is what kids will find appealing. When I was a teen, I really wanted to get my ears pierced a second time. However, my parents said no. Once I left home as an adult, I decided to get piercings… a whole lot of them! At one point I was up to 33 piercings.

I eventually realized I didn’t need (or really want) that many. It wasn’t very comfortable to sleep anymore for one thing! Recently I had a full circle moment on this with my own teenage daughter. She asked for a second ear piercing and I was happy to get curious about it with her. We discussed what she thought, why she wanted one, and helped her come to an informed decision. Her being able to explore that decision and have that conversation in a way was also healing for me.

Critics could argue that children can’t learn intrinsic motivation and boundaries unless we give them external limits. However, I really feel that true structure arises when children are given the space to experiment, fail, and learn within safe limits. The idea for me is to parent through connection instead of coercion and develop a strong relationship.

Education Reimagined

With all that said, my parenting approach also influences how we homeschool. I like to think of it as a child-led, curiosity-driven approach. When my oldest was first approaching school age, I remember reading so many parenting and education books. What I found was that many of them didn’t resonate with how I wanted my kids to be able to learn and grow.

After plenty of research (and some trial and error), I adopted a few core elements when it came to my kids’ education.

  • Prioritizing intrinsic motivation instead of external rewards and punishments
  • Letting my children lead the way in what they were interested in
  • Learning through practical life skills

Everyone will have their own way of approaching their child’s education and some of it also depends on their state’s requirements. We live in a fairly free state when it comes to homeschooling regulations. So my kids can check the boxes for what the state requires pretty quickly, then they’re free to move onto what I consider the real learning!

In Real Life

So what does this actually look like?

We don’t have a typical homeschool day, but I encourage my kids to learn through what they’re interested in. For my one son that means reading tons of books every single week. Recently, for my daughter that meant planning and executing a total room remodel in the house. Including planning the room layout, budgeting, and building a library … complete with a rolling ladder! They’ve taken classes in anatomy, science, and other subjects depending on their passions.

I encourage practical life skills. Each of my kids has a contract with me where they’ve agreed no cell phone or car until they’ve had a profitable business for one year. We take lots of field trips, and they take ownership, show leadership, and follow through with plans.  

The Case for Unconventional Education

This approach can come as a shock for some. Don’t we need all of the school subjects every single day? Don’t kids need to be in a classroom for 8 hours? What about pages of multiple choice tests to make sure they’re learning? While none of these things are inherently bad or wrong, I’d challenge that they’re necessary for true education.

When I think back to my grade school education, I remember very little of the facts I learned in my textbooks. What I do remember are the experiences and pursuits that challenged me and interested me.

Something that really shocked me? I found out that kids who literally received no formal schooling at all, if they decide to go to college later, it takes them less than a year to fully catch up to their peers. The important key here, is when they have the internal motivation to learn, they rapidly catch up. My friend Jesse Elder had a similar experience. Although he never had any traditional schooling, it in no way hindered him from becoming a highly successful entrepreneur. You can listen to more of his story here on the podcast.

Researchers have known for over a decade that unschooled children are capable of thriving in a college environment. They noted that unschooled students who went to college (including Ivy League schools) easily adjusted to the academics and were able to quickly pick up the needed skills. The students reported their self-motivation and self-learning gave them an advantage over their peers. 20-50% of these students pursued STEM careers that required advanced mathematics and science courses.

Addressing Concerns to Unconventional Parenting

One of the common concerns is that this child-led approach can lack necessary structure. However, I’ve found that with some help and guidance, children can begin to learn internal discipline. It can take an adjustment period if they’re not used to this.

Another common objection is what about socialization? Between youth group, track meets, tumbling class, and other groups, in my experience homeschooled kids can have plenty of socialization opportunities! I’d also challenge the idea that kids need to only be with their peers all day. Having groups with mixed ages and diversity helps them learn to interact with all kinds of people.

Examples of This Approach to Education

The idea of stepping away from conventional education is quite a mental leap for most people. In my research, I found some interesting examples of this throughout history.

Thomas Edison, arguably one of the most influential inventors in history, was dismissed from his local school house. The teachers said he was “addled,” deemed him unable to learn and sent him home. With a grand total of 3 months at a traditional school, Edison was instead homeschooled in the basics by his mom. He largely taught himself through reading, research, and experimentation.

Alexander Graham Bell, the inventor of the telephone, is another example. He attended school for about 4 years before dropping out and becoming self-taught. The prolific author Agatha Christie was also homeschooled and taught herself to read at a young age. Abraham Lincoln was homeschooled and largely self-taught. The first female Supreme Court justice, Sandra Day O’Connor, accredited her strong foundation in critical thinking to her early homeschool days.

There are many more examples of this, but I think you get the idea! On a more personal note, I’ve seen creativity blossom in my own kids. My kids continually amaze me with the solutions they come up with that are far better than anything I could have given them!

Key Takeaways and Final Thoughts

This approach does demand more from parents, but I’ve found the deeper connections and trust are worth it. While I’m certainly not perfect, I try to treat my children as their own infinite autonomous beings. It’s about approaching them with curiosity and helping guide them to develop their own innate skills.

I know this method is really outside of the box for many, but I hope you can approach it with curiosity.

I’d love to hear your thoughts! Did any of this resonate with you? How do you approach parenting and education?



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Big sunspots have been few and far between on the sun in recent weeks. But there sure have been lots of smaller ones. On most sunny days I set up a small, filtered telescope to see what the sun’s up to. Solar observing is incredibly fast and easy — telescope, safe filter placed securely over the front lens, tripod, and you’re good to go.

Solar telescope

This is my simple setup for solar observing — 80mm refracting telescope, a solar filter over the front, and tripod.

Contributed / Bob King

On March 16 it looked someone had sprinkled bits of dirt across the sun. I counted 13 different sunspot groups that day using a magnification of 27x. None of them displayed any impressive spots, at least compared to the behemoths of last summer. But their sheer number made an impression.

Sunspots are sites on the sun where magnetic energy is strongly concentrated. They’re dark because they’re about 3,500 degrees cooler than the surrounding 10,000-degree surface. Strong magnetic fields — like those around an ordinary bar magnet but thousands of times more intense — inhibit the flow of hot gases from the solar interior, insulating and chilling the area. Chill is a relative term. Despite their dark appearance, spots are still around 13 times hotter than a very hot oven.

Sunspot group visible UV with whorls and magnet filings S.jpg

An enormous sunspot group from Nov. 2014 is seen in visible light at left. The center view shows the same group in ultraviolet light, and it reveals the whorls of group’s magnetic field. Sprinkle iron filings around a bar magnet (right) and you’ll see similar lines of magnetic force.

Contributed / NASA (left and center), Bob King (right)

At first glance, it may look like the spots are randomly scattered across the sun, but most gather in groups. Some groups stand alone and are easy to tell apart. For others it takes a little experience to see where the border of one ends and a new one starts.

Each group’s members are magnetically linked to each other, with one section acting as the north pole of a magnet, and the other as the south pole. Each bunch is assigned a number so we can keep track of it as the sun slowly rotates on its axis once approximately every 4 weeks.

Astronomers have been counting spots systematically since 1847, but useful data goes back to the early 1600s. Sunspot number is a good indicator of overall solar activity. Flares and coronal mass ejections are frequently connected to sunspot groups, so the more spots — and the more complex sunspot groups become — the better the chances for solar storms to occur. And that means increasing chances to see the northern lights.

Counting them is easy enough, but there’s a twist. Astronomers tally both individual sunspots and groups. Each group is assigned a value of 10 spots. In the photo there are 13 groups, so 13 multiplied by 10 is 130. Next, you add in the number of individual sunspots. I counted 40. Together, the total sunspot number for March 16 comes to 170. That’s a high number and indicative of strong solar activity.

When formally submitting sunspot tallies, an observer also has to multiply their result by a small factor depending on observing conditions and equipment. By counting sunspots with a small, filtered telescope, arriving at what the monthly average is, and plotting the result on a piece of graph paper, the ups and downs of the 11-year solar cycle will appear right before your eyes.

Solar cycle from 1700 to 2025

Counting sunspots reveals the ups and downs of the solar cycle. Sunspot number is shown at left with a timeline along the bottom. Monthly peaks for each cycle are shown in black. Solar Cycle 1 peaked in the year 1761; we’re now in Cycle 25. Notice how sunspot numbers (solar activity) vary from cycle to cycle. The red hump in Cycle 25 is the original prediction, which has been exceeded.

Contributed / NASA, NOAA, ISES

Or you can have the professionals do it. They count sunspots, average monthly numbers and lay it all out on a curve to look for trends. They also study historical patterns and include data like how much radio energy the sun produces, which fluctuates throughout the solar cycle. Before every new cycle they gather and make a prediction of when the next peak, called solar maximum, will occur.

The original forecast for the current cycle, dubbed Cycle 25, was made in 2019 with the peak predicted for this upcoming July. However, more recent forecasts hint that we reached maximum in late 2024, so we may have already passed the peak. A more definitive answer will have to wait until the sun enters a slump. Then we’ll be able to look back with hindsight and better frame the time.

March 21 aurora

A moderate geomagnetic storm hit on Friday night, March 21, lighting up the northern sky with colorful auroras. A stronger storm is expected Saturday night, March 22.

Contributed / Bob King

In the meantime, enjoy the sun’s busy period while you can by catching the northern lights. On Friday night, March 21, we had a fine display in the Duluth region. A stronger storm is forecast for Saturday night, March 22. If the sky stays clear, go out as early as 9 p.m., look north from a dark location, and you might just see arcs and rays dance across the northern sky. I’ll post updates on my Facebook page at facebook.com/astrobobking.

“Astro” Bob King is a freelance writer and retired photographer for the Duluth News Tribune. You can reach him at nightsky55@gmail.com.





Source link