Minnesota House advances bill to mandate cooperation, reports to ICE for violent arrests – InForum


ST. PAUL — The Minnesota House Public Safety Committee advanced a bill Wednesday that would require local law enforcement to report an individual arrested for a violent offense to ICE and to cooperate in data sharing with federal immigration authorities.

The bill,

HF16

, sponsored by Max Rymer, R-North Branch, would require local law enforcement to inform U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, when an undocumented individual is arrested on suspicion of committing a crime of violence”, even if the county elects not to file charges. The bill also makes it illegal for officials to restrict the release of individual immigration status data to federal immigration authorities or to establish any policy that would limit local law enforcement officials from cooperating with federal immigration authorities.

“The motive for this bill is to open up a line of communication between local authorities and dealing with dangerous criminals who should not be in our community,” Rymer said in committee on Wednesday, March 12. “Right now, we find ourselves at a moment where you have local officials who are openly defying immigration enforcement and language around it, from the Minneapolis mayor, to the Hennepin County prosecutor.”

Minneapolis and St. Paul in February joined other cities across the country in declaring themselves “

sanctuary cities

” and joining a San Francisco lawsuit against President Donald Trump’s immigration policies. The sanctuary cities have asserted that local law enforcement will not cooperate with federal immigration efforts.

Todd Barnette, Minneapolis Community Safety Commissioner testified in opposition to the bill, arguing it would erode public trust.

“Many people may avoid accessing essential services such as health care, education and social services if they fear that these interactions might expose them to immigration enforcement,” Barnette said in the committee. “This bill will result in decreased safety for Minneapolis and its residents, and it would directly impact the trust that the public and residents have with the city and with our city staff and officers.”

12 counties across Minnesota have also declared themselves “

sanctuary counties

” for immigrants: Anoka, Cottonwood, Dakota, Hennepin, Jackson, Kandiyohi, Lincoln, Lyon, Nobles, Pipestone, Ramsey and Watonwan, according to the Center for Immigration Studies.

ICEBillDSC_0776.JPG

Opponents of HF16 to limit non-cooperation with federal immigration protest before the bill’s hearing on Thursday, March 13, 2025.

Mary Murphy / Forum News Service

Rep. Elliot Engen, R-Lino Lakes, argued that this bill would enhance public trust.

“When we’re saying that it’s going to break down public safety, that it’s going to break down community trust, it’s only going to improve that, because if those people are in our communities implementing those acts, we don’t want them there,” Engen said. “We don’t want those people free to roam and create more victims of Minnesotans.”

Ben Gleekel with the Immigrant Law Center of Minnesota, said before the committee on Wednesday that since HF16 says that anyone “arrested” not “convicted” of a violent offense should be reported to federal immigration, the bill would erode due process rights.

Rep. Sandra Feist, DFL-New Brighton, said in committee that this bill perpetuates ideas that immigrants are inherently a “public safety threat.” Feist referenced written testimony by David Beir, Director of Immigration Studies at the Cato Institute, a policy research organization in Washington, D.C, which found that immigrants are

1.2% less likely

to commit serious crimes than U.S.-born individuals.

The bill, which drew about 20 protesters outside the hearing room on Wednesday, passed 10-9 along party lines and now moves to the Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee.

Minnesota has an estimated

81,000 non-citizens

at risk of deportation according to the Migration Policy Institute. The state’s total immigrant population, documented and undocumented, is

just under 500,000

or 9% of the state’s population, according to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development.

Mary Murphy joined Forum Communications in October 2024 as the Minnesota State Correspondent. She can be reached by email at mmurphy@forumcomm.com.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Big sunspots have been few and far between on the sun in recent weeks. But there sure have been lots of smaller ones. On most sunny days I set up a small, filtered telescope to see what the sun’s up to. Solar observing is incredibly fast and easy — telescope, safe filter placed securely over the front lens, tripod, and you’re good to go.

Solar telescope

This is my simple setup for solar observing — 80mm refracting telescope, a solar filter over the front, and tripod.

Contributed / Bob King

On March 16 it looked someone had sprinkled bits of dirt across the sun. I counted 13 different sunspot groups that day using a magnification of 27x. None of them displayed any impressive spots, at least compared to the behemoths of last summer. But their sheer number made an impression.

Sunspots are sites on the sun where magnetic energy is strongly concentrated. They’re dark because they’re about 3,500 degrees cooler than the surrounding 10,000-degree surface. Strong magnetic fields — like those around an ordinary bar magnet but thousands of times more intense — inhibit the flow of hot gases from the solar interior, insulating and chilling the area. Chill is a relative term. Despite their dark appearance, spots are still around 13 times hotter than a very hot oven.

Sunspot group visible UV with whorls and magnet filings S.jpg

An enormous sunspot group from Nov. 2014 is seen in visible light at left. The center view shows the same group in ultraviolet light, and it reveals the whorls of group’s magnetic field. Sprinkle iron filings around a bar magnet (right) and you’ll see similar lines of magnetic force.

Contributed / NASA (left and center), Bob King (right)

At first glance, it may look like the spots are randomly scattered across the sun, but most gather in groups. Some groups stand alone and are easy to tell apart. For others it takes a little experience to see where the border of one ends and a new one starts.

Each group’s members are magnetically linked to each other, with one section acting as the north pole of a magnet, and the other as the south pole. Each bunch is assigned a number so we can keep track of it as the sun slowly rotates on its axis once approximately every 4 weeks.

Astronomers have been counting spots systematically since 1847, but useful data goes back to the early 1600s. Sunspot number is a good indicator of overall solar activity. Flares and coronal mass ejections are frequently connected to sunspot groups, so the more spots — and the more complex sunspot groups become — the better the chances for solar storms to occur. And that means increasing chances to see the northern lights.

Counting them is easy enough, but there’s a twist. Astronomers tally both individual sunspots and groups. Each group is assigned a value of 10 spots. In the photo there are 13 groups, so 13 multiplied by 10 is 130. Next, you add in the number of individual sunspots. I counted 40. Together, the total sunspot number for March 16 comes to 170. That’s a high number and indicative of strong solar activity.

When formally submitting sunspot tallies, an observer also has to multiply their result by a small factor depending on observing conditions and equipment. By counting sunspots with a small, filtered telescope, arriving at what the monthly average is, and plotting the result on a piece of graph paper, the ups and downs of the 11-year solar cycle will appear right before your eyes.

Solar cycle from 1700 to 2025

Counting sunspots reveals the ups and downs of the solar cycle. Sunspot number is shown at left with a timeline along the bottom. Monthly peaks for each cycle are shown in black. Solar Cycle 1 peaked in the year 1761; we’re now in Cycle 25. Notice how sunspot numbers (solar activity) vary from cycle to cycle. The red hump in Cycle 25 is the original prediction, which has been exceeded.

Contributed / NASA, NOAA, ISES

Or you can have the professionals do it. They count sunspots, average monthly numbers and lay it all out on a curve to look for trends. They also study historical patterns and include data like how much radio energy the sun produces, which fluctuates throughout the solar cycle. Before every new cycle they gather and make a prediction of when the next peak, called solar maximum, will occur.

The original forecast for the current cycle, dubbed Cycle 25, was made in 2019 with the peak predicted for this upcoming July. However, more recent forecasts hint that we reached maximum in late 2024, so we may have already passed the peak. A more definitive answer will have to wait until the sun enters a slump. Then we’ll be able to look back with hindsight and better frame the time.

March 21 aurora

A moderate geomagnetic storm hit on Friday night, March 21, lighting up the northern sky with colorful auroras. A stronger storm is expected Saturday night, March 22.

Contributed / Bob King

In the meantime, enjoy the sun’s busy period while you can by catching the northern lights. On Friday night, March 21, we had a fine display in the Duluth region. A stronger storm is forecast for Saturday night, March 22. If the sky stays clear, go out as early as 9 p.m., look north from a dark location, and you might just see arcs and rays dance across the northern sky. I’ll post updates on my Facebook page at facebook.com/astrobobking.

“Astro” Bob King is a freelance writer and retired photographer for the Duluth News Tribune. You can reach him at nightsky55@gmail.com.





Source link