Jo Wenberg on Vanderpump Rules Scene She Refused to Film


Jo Wenberg Slams Schwartz's “Shame in Public, Love in Private” Comment

Credit: Instagram

Jo Wenberg addressed Tom Schwartz’s claim that he “shame[s] in public” and “love[s] in private,” and she called it “bizarre” that he still has her “blocked.” The Vanderpump Rules star also shared that she’s neurodivergent, and hinted at what happened behind the scenes.

Though Jo was open about her feelings for Tom in season 11, he seemed to downplay the extent of their relationship. Since their split, Jo has shared that she still has feelings for him, and she’s made several posts about their past romance.

In an interview for “Talk Tea with Thee,” the host shared that someone “high up in production” at Pump Rules told her that Jo was “the nicest cast member he ever filmed with,” and that she knew each crew member’s name and “helped them carry equipment from the trucks.”

“No one mentions those moments,” said Jo. “The crew were confused when I would try to help them carry the sound equipment back.” Despite her rapport with the crew, she claimed castmates weren’t allowed to “get their phone numbers,” and a “separation” was enforced.

Jo expressed that, initially on the show, she was meant to film just a quick “chitchat” with Tom – after cameras caught her walking out of his apartment the season before.

“[Then] they were like ‘Oh, Schwarz is … hiding this woman,’” she continued. “All of a sudden, two hours [of filming] snowballed into … being almost a main character and then consistently filming and doing the three-part reunion, doing the finale, doing the pickups, doing the interviews.”

She also said she was “love-bombed” by Schwartz, who told her multiple times that he was “in love” with her.

Jo finds it “so bizarre” that he still blocked her phone and Instagram, as there’s still “no reason” for it. According to Jo, she still posts about their past romance because she’s being open about her thoughts.

At one point in the podcast, the host brought up Schwartz’s recent quote in an interview – about how he used to “shame in public and love in private” – regarding his past relationships.

“That’s mind-blowing to me,” Jo reacted. “There’s something underlying there … His commitment level is a level one out of 10. We’ve seen this throughout the years. And then, of course, I’m blamed because I was loved behind the cameras and then not on camera. And it looks like I’m delusional.”

Jo hinted that a producer suggested she film a scene with Scheana Shay to discuss her relationship with Schwartz, but Jo told them “no way,” after Scheana was unkind to her.

As for her future, Jo said she’s open to filming another reality show, and she wants to write a book. The star said she recently learned she’s “neurodivergent,” and she pointed out how people have made fun of her because her brain works differently from others’.

According to Jo, before the “green-yellow-red wristband” party, Tom told her that he would wear a red one, indicating he’s not available.

“[But] we get there and he slaps on a green one saying that he’s single, and then he kisses that girl,” she said. “By the way, [the girl] was hired.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews



After Israel took out at least two of Iran’s top scientists behind the development of nuclear weapons (and promised to kill more), my high school fight song came to mind. At football games after a touchdown we sang, “Hit ’em hard and hit ’em again. Show ’em now that we’re gonna win…”

That is precisely what Israel has done in several strikes against its mortal enemy that has threatened to exterminate the Jewish state, reneged on past agreements to curtail its enrichment of uranium and made statements about its religious motivation for attacks on Israel and support of various terrorist proxies. Why shouldn’t Israel be expected to defend itself against the stated aims of the Islamic fanatics in Tehran? If your neighbor threatened to kill you would you not take steps to keep that from happening?

The diplomatic “rope-a-dope” strategy used by Iran to string out negotiations in order to continue pursuing uranium enrichment with a nuclear weapon – its likely outcome – has worked over several U.S. administrations. It is similar to a strategy Japan used at the start of World War II where Japanese negotiators were at the White House the day Pearl Harbor was attacked. You can’t negotiate with evil, or evil wins.

Cal Thomas commentary

Cal Thomas Commentary

Tribune graphic

Mossad, perhaps the greatest intelligence agency in the world (our CIA might take lessons), managed to penetrate deep into Iran with a drone base and other weapons which took out many, but not all, of Iran’s missile launchers. Some missiles got through and hit parts of Tel Aviv, wounding scores and killing some civilians.

President Trump has declared that if Iran doesn’t return to negotiations, it will suffer far worse attacks. That should not be the goal, because there is no evidence that Iran would behave any differently if previously failed negotiations resume.

The goal should be regime change. The current Iranian regime came to power in 1979, thanks to Jimmy Carter undermining the shah, who kept the fanatics now running and ruining the country at bay. The shah had his problems, but was pro-West. Since then, the Islamic regime has sustained itself with guns, crooked elections, by suppressing protests and jailing or killing those opposed to the ayatollahs. The Middle East – indeed the world – would be better off and a safer place if the regime were to fall. The important question is who would take their place? It can’t be a repeat of 1979 with different faces but the same objectives.

There is political opposition in Iran and we occasionally hear voices that claim support for human rights, free elections and other things appealing to Western ears. There have been street protests, which the Revolutionary Guard quickly extinguished. While additional military attacks could set back Iran’s nuclear weapons program even further, force alone is unlikely to topple the government and replace it with people who will live at peace with Israel.

In a televised address after the bombing began, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urged Iranians to effectively overthrow their government: “Israel’s fight is not against the Iranian people. Our fight is against the murderous Islamic regime that oppresses and impoverishes you. The time has come for the Iranian people to unite around its flag and its historic legacy, by standing up for your freedom from the evil and oppressive regime. This is your opportunity to stand up and let your voices be heard.”

That would be the ideal outcome, but fear keeps many people from acting on their beliefs and goals. Overcoming fear takes courage and a willingness to sacrifice even your own life. Are there enough Iranians prepared to stand against the power and weapons of the ayatollahs?

This Cal Thomas commentary is his opinion. He can be reached at cthomas@wctrib.com.

______________________________________________________

This story was written by one of our partner news agencies. Forum Communications Company uses content from agencies such as Reuters, Kaiser Health News, Tribune News Service and others to provide a wider range of news to our readers. Learn more about the news services FCC uses here.





Source link