Ethics panel deadlocks on complaints against senator charged with felony — again



A Republican push to oust a Democratic-Farmer-Labor state senator accused of felony burglary has stalled once again in the Senate’s ethics committee.

At a Thursday hearing, the Senate Subcommittee on Ethics deadlocked 2-2 on partisan lines on two new complaints against Sen. Nicole Mitchell, DFL-Woodbury, who was arrested last April in Detroit Lakes on suspicion of breaking into her estranged stepmother’s home.

The committee will take up the matter again after Mitchell’s trial.

Mitchell has faced calls to resign since her arrest — including from members of her own party — but Republican efforts to remove her from office have failed in the Senate, where Democrats currently have a one-seat majority.

Republicans filed an ethics complaint against Mitchell last year and renewed their efforts in February after prosecutors filed an additional felony charge against the senator.

New complaints

One of the two new complaints includes the additional charge. In a second complaint, Republicans argue Mitchell had a conflict of interest when she voted to block a Senate motion that would have opened the path to an expulsion vote.

When that motion came up in January, the Senate was tied 33-33 between the parties following the death of Minneapolis DFL Sen. Kari Dziedzic. If Mitchell didn’t vote, Republicans would have prevailed 33-32.

However, if that motion did succeed, an expulsion vote still required backing from 45 of the Senate’s 67 members to pass. It’s unlikely 12 DFLers would vote with Republicans to deprive themselves of a majority.

DFLers argue Mitchell should face due process, and that there shouldn’t be any action on Mitchell until her trial is complete. Right now that’s scheduled for June — after the legislative session ends. It was originally scheduled for January but Mitchell’s attorney’s obtained a delay because state lawmakers can postpone trials if it coincides with the legislative session.

Hours of testimony

While prospects of Mitchell’s removal remain remote, the GOP continues to push for discipline. The four members of the Senate ethics committee — two DFLers and two Republicans — heard hours of testimony Thursday from Mitchell and Republican senators on the new complaints.

A measure to find probable cause that Mitchell violated Senate ethics rules and another to investigate Mitchell further failed on party lines.

Sen. Steve Drazkowski, R-Mazeppa, argued Mitchell had a conflict of interest while voting on her own fate in the senate.

“There can be no greater conflict of interest than the threat of losing one’s job in its entirety,” he said, noting the pay, benefits and other privileges that come from serving in office. “She had everything to gain from casting her decisive vote on Jan. 27 and everything to lose.”

Mitchell, meanwhile, argued Senate rules specifically apply to measures where a member has a financial interest such as ownership of a company or stocks, not employment.

“We all vote on things that impact ourselves because we are also citizens of Minnesota,” Mitchell told the committee, using bonding bills funding district projects as an example.

Further, Mitchell said she did not vote on her expulsion, but a procedural vote which would have opened that possibility. If an expulsion vote happened, Mitchell said she would excuse herself.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Big sunspots have been few and far between on the sun in recent weeks. But there sure have been lots of smaller ones. On most sunny days I set up a small, filtered telescope to see what the sun’s up to. Solar observing is incredibly fast and easy — telescope, safe filter placed securely over the front lens, tripod, and you’re good to go.

Solar telescope

This is my simple setup for solar observing — 80mm refracting telescope, a solar filter over the front, and tripod.

Contributed / Bob King

On March 16 it looked someone had sprinkled bits of dirt across the sun. I counted 13 different sunspot groups that day using a magnification of 27x. None of them displayed any impressive spots, at least compared to the behemoths of last summer. But their sheer number made an impression.

Sunspots are sites on the sun where magnetic energy is strongly concentrated. They’re dark because they’re about 3,500 degrees cooler than the surrounding 10,000-degree surface. Strong magnetic fields — like those around an ordinary bar magnet but thousands of times more intense — inhibit the flow of hot gases from the solar interior, insulating and chilling the area. Chill is a relative term. Despite their dark appearance, spots are still around 13 times hotter than a very hot oven.

Sunspot group visible UV with whorls and magnet filings S.jpg

An enormous sunspot group from Nov. 2014 is seen in visible light at left. The center view shows the same group in ultraviolet light, and it reveals the whorls of group’s magnetic field. Sprinkle iron filings around a bar magnet (right) and you’ll see similar lines of magnetic force.

Contributed / NASA (left and center), Bob King (right)

At first glance, it may look like the spots are randomly scattered across the sun, but most gather in groups. Some groups stand alone and are easy to tell apart. For others it takes a little experience to see where the border of one ends and a new one starts.

Each group’s members are magnetically linked to each other, with one section acting as the north pole of a magnet, and the other as the south pole. Each bunch is assigned a number so we can keep track of it as the sun slowly rotates on its axis once approximately every 4 weeks.

Astronomers have been counting spots systematically since 1847, but useful data goes back to the early 1600s. Sunspot number is a good indicator of overall solar activity. Flares and coronal mass ejections are frequently connected to sunspot groups, so the more spots — and the more complex sunspot groups become — the better the chances for solar storms to occur. And that means increasing chances to see the northern lights.

Counting them is easy enough, but there’s a twist. Astronomers tally both individual sunspots and groups. Each group is assigned a value of 10 spots. In the photo there are 13 groups, so 13 multiplied by 10 is 130. Next, you add in the number of individual sunspots. I counted 40. Together, the total sunspot number for March 16 comes to 170. That’s a high number and indicative of strong solar activity.

When formally submitting sunspot tallies, an observer also has to multiply their result by a small factor depending on observing conditions and equipment. By counting sunspots with a small, filtered telescope, arriving at what the monthly average is, and plotting the result on a piece of graph paper, the ups and downs of the 11-year solar cycle will appear right before your eyes.

Solar cycle from 1700 to 2025

Counting sunspots reveals the ups and downs of the solar cycle. Sunspot number is shown at left with a timeline along the bottom. Monthly peaks for each cycle are shown in black. Solar Cycle 1 peaked in the year 1761; we’re now in Cycle 25. Notice how sunspot numbers (solar activity) vary from cycle to cycle. The red hump in Cycle 25 is the original prediction, which has been exceeded.

Contributed / NASA, NOAA, ISES

Or you can have the professionals do it. They count sunspots, average monthly numbers and lay it all out on a curve to look for trends. They also study historical patterns and include data like how much radio energy the sun produces, which fluctuates throughout the solar cycle. Before every new cycle they gather and make a prediction of when the next peak, called solar maximum, will occur.

The original forecast for the current cycle, dubbed Cycle 25, was made in 2019 with the peak predicted for this upcoming July. However, more recent forecasts hint that we reached maximum in late 2024, so we may have already passed the peak. A more definitive answer will have to wait until the sun enters a slump. Then we’ll be able to look back with hindsight and better frame the time.

March 21 aurora

A moderate geomagnetic storm hit on Friday night, March 21, lighting up the northern sky with colorful auroras. A stronger storm is expected Saturday night, March 22.

Contributed / Bob King

In the meantime, enjoy the sun’s busy period while you can by catching the northern lights. On Friday night, March 21, we had a fine display in the Duluth region. A stronger storm is forecast for Saturday night, March 22. If the sky stays clear, go out as early as 9 p.m., look north from a dark location, and you might just see arcs and rays dance across the northern sky. I’ll post updates on my Facebook page at facebook.com/astrobobking.

“Astro” Bob King is a freelance writer and retired photographer for the Duluth News Tribune. You can reach him at nightsky55@gmail.com.





Source link